Активная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве

© РИА Новости / Илья ПиталевПерейти в фотобанкНачало работ по сносу недостроенного здания больницы на Клинской улице в ХовриноАктивная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве
© РИА Новости / Илья ПиталевПерейти в фотобанк

ОСКВА, 6 ноя — РИА Недвижимость. Активная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве, сообщил журналистам руководитель проекта генподрядчика работ «Стройэкоресурс» Дмитрий Котыхов.

Активная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве
© РИА Новости / Максим БлиновПерейти в фотобанкХовринскую больницу в Москве снесут к концу февраля»Основной процесс демонтажа будет осуществляться эффективно, одновременно разрушая с разных сторон здания 12-13 этажи, доставая до особо сложных элементов. Объекты эпохи 80-х будут превращаться в общую массу отходов для последующей переработки», — рассказал Котыхов.

По его словам, к объекту доставили дополнительную разрушительную технику. Техника позволяет демонтировать здания на высоте до 60 метров.

© РИА Новости / Антон ДенисовПерейти в фотобанк Снос недостроенного здания больницы на Клинской улице в Москве. 6 ноября 2018 Активная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве
© РИА Новости / Антон ДенисовПерейти в фотобанк Снос недостроенного здания больницы на Клинской улице в Москве. 6 ноября 2018

«По проекту демонтажа общий срок демонтажа составляет не более шести месяцев. Но учитывая значимость объекта, компания приняла решение завершить все в короткие сроки. Ориентировочный срок завершения всех работ — конец февраля 2019 года. Грунты никаким образом не препятствуют сносу», — отметил Котыхов.

© РИА Новости / Антон ДенисовПерейти в фотобанк Снос недостроенного здания больницы на Клинской улице в Москве. 6 ноября 2018 Активная фаза сноса Ховринской больницы началась в Москве
© РИА Новости / Антон ДенисовПерейти в фотобанк Снос недостроенного здания больницы на Клинской улице в Москве. 6 ноября 2018

Источник: realty.ria.ru

39 комментариев

I am now not positive the place you’re getting your info,
but good topic. I needs to spend some time finding out much more or figuring out
more. Thanks for great information I was in search of this
information for my mission.

Great article! This is the type of information that
should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for
no longer positioning this post upper! Come on over and seek advice from my website .
Thanks =)

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players through the years than I will count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to find how well-designed and fun to utilize the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of «neighbors» will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune «Social» is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I will count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the previous couple of years I’ve settled down to 1 distinct players. Why? Because I was happy to find out how well-designed and fun to utilize the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over time than I will count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the previous few years I’ve settled down to at least one type of players. Why? Because I was happy to find how well-designed and fun to utilize the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of «neighbors» will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune «Social» is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players through the years than I will count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the previous few years I’ve settled down to 1 type of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to utilize the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Добавить комментарий

*

3 + 7 =